Skip to main content

Using data to inform decision-making within the Student Support Team

LAC Case Study: International School of Phnom Penh

(This post is by Jonathan Smedes, Director of Learning, Teaching, Innovation and Impact at ISPP)

THE SCHOOL
The International School of Phnom Penh (ISPP) is an internationally accredited day school located in the capital city of Cambodia, Phnom Penh. The school hosts students from approximately 50 different nationalities and has a current enrollment of approximately 920 students from Early Years to Grade 12. Established in 1989, the school has grown from a small community school, servicing a few expatriate families, to a beacon school in the region, attracting students from all over Asia and beyond who make Phnom Penh home. It is the only parent-governed, not for profit, internationally accredited (CIS/WASC) school in Cambodia. ISPP is fully authorized to run the PYP, MYP and DP and is a member of host of other international organizations. 

 

THE CHALLENGE

In the Secondary School (Grades 6 to 12), the Support Services Team (SST) meets regularly to make decisions about the services provided to individual students based on their unique needs. These needs could be related to English language placement, a learning support need, or even a counselling or health related response. As every student’s context and needs are different, the team relies heavily on qualitative (teacher feedback, observations, referrals, etc.) and quantitative (assessment achievement, standardized tests, etc.) data to make appropriate decisions about differing levels of support that can be provided to each student. 

 

Over the years, the team has struggled to compile and synthesize all of the data needed which will be used to inform their decision making. The sheer amount of data and the non-uniform way in which the data was housed meant that this task was time-consuming and caused a delay in decision making. It meant that students were not receiving appropriate responses or interventions to their needs in a timely manner and teachers became frustrated at a perceived lack of inaction. Furthermore, because the data was housed in a variety of different forms and locations, key pieces of information were sometimes missed, causing potential inappropriate responses to the original concern. 

 

THE SOLUTION 

ISPP became interested in Learning Analytics Collaborative at an early stage, primarily as a way to house important school-wide assessment data. It was originally felt that the benefit of the LAC would be to provide bigger picture information about school-wide achievement both over the course of a semester or year, and longitudinally. As years of data became available in this one-stop-shop approach, it quickly became clear that in the Secondary School, the greatest use for teachers was being able to drill down and receive information about individual student achievement. 

 

The SST was also naturally drawn to the individual student data dashboards as a way to create a quick snapshot of student performance over time in order to help inform individualized responses to student concerns. Where once, the team may have leapt to a conclusion about a particular student based on current teacher feedback, they were now able to provide much more context with more specific sets of longitudinal data that inform more appropriate responses and interventions. 

 

THE OUTCOME 

Nowadays, when discussing student concerns or achievement, the LAC is our first port of call. We have been able to work with the team at the LAC to make the data work for our context. We have developed whole school protocols for how teachers look at and make information decisions and there is now a culture that data can be used as a powerful tool to inform our practices and responses.


Popular posts from this blog

Using Social and Emotional Data to Promote a Positive School Culture

I came across this great article on Edutopia by Victoria Curry and Mike Setaro on how school leaders can combine traditional data with social and emotional data to get a full picture of the school experience of students and staff. It’s centered around Warm data that gives both dimension and measure to an individual’s and group’s social and emotional status. Opposite to Cool data points, that are a series of structural data sets such as enrollment, attendance, and academic proficiency that typically are the bedrock of school-based analytics. They talk about various examples of Warm data points among them on a matrix with different degrees of pleasantness and energy before engaging in learning (inspired by Mark Brackett’s work). These points can and should be captured, measured and visualized. The insights from this data should be of utmost importance for leaders to find strategies that capture and leverage information related to SEL and interpersonal skills. Harnessing this level of und...
Post a Comment
Read more

Atlas Protocol - Looking at data

The Atlas Protocol is one of the most commonly used structured dialogue formats among schools to facilitate a conversation about data for teachers and other members of the faculty. Learning from Data is a tool to guide groups of teachers discovering what students, educators, and the public understands and how they are thinking. The tool, developed by Eric Buchovecky, is based in part on the work of the Leadership for Urban Mathematics Project and of the Assessment Communities of Teachers Project. The tool also draws on the work of Steve Seidel and Evangeline Harris-Stefanakis of Project Zero at Harvard University. The protocol gives a detailed step by step guide on how to prepare and conduct a healthy, productive conversation about and with use of data. It starts with a selection of datasets that do not lead to a single conclusion and generally lead to rich conversations. From that point forward, the protocol describes 6 stages the group has to follow with the help of a facilitator in...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Data Can’t Do

I came across this fascinating article from the The New Yorker that really speaks volumes about how careful we have to be when it comes to using and visualizing data. Whenever you try to force the real world to do something that can be counted, unintended consequences abound. The COVID pandemic demonstrated just how vulnerable the world can be when you don’t have good statistics, and the US Presidential election filled our newspapers with polls and projections, all meant to slake our thirst for insight. The same applies to education where knowing what to measure, but also why you want to measure it, is the primary hurdle to tackle. We all have a tendency to naturally trust data as it aims to represent something we are observing. However there are times when simply even solid data is not enough for decision making. That’s why the context, the aim, and the balance between quantitative and qualitative data is so important. As the article states: “The great psychologist Daniel Kahneman, w...
Post a Comment
Read more