Skip to main content

LAC School Spotlight - International School of Beijing

International School of Beijing
(by Ruth Poulsen, Director of Curriculum and Assessment, ISB)

Number of students: 1700
Grades: EY-12
Number of faculty: 200
Curriculum: IB DP, Common Core
Accredited by: CIS
Joined LAC in 2019 School Year 

What was the challenge the school was facing?
ISB is very rich in the amount of data we collect, but we found that a challenge was that we were housing that data in various places. LAC gave us one place to start visualizing all of our data in one place.

Why was LAC chosen?
We started with another company at first, but LAC’s visualizations were much cleaner and easier to understand. We really loved the individual student reports which visualize various kinds of data side by side.

Who uses the platform at the school?

  • Our leadership team looks at schoolwide data together twice a year, once in October and once in June.
  • Teacher leaders in various subject areas look at programmatic data once or twice per year.
  • Individual teachers look at the LAC portal data 1- 3 times per year, depending on their subject area and grade level.

How often and at what critical times of the year is it being used the most?
In Elementary school, teachers do Beginning of year, Middle of year, and end of year data meetings. In Secondary, this is more like twice a year. 

What are the ways in which data and the platform are being used by teachers and leadership?
We often use the “Here’s What, So What, Now What” protocol to reflect on the data in order to name patterns and consider multiple possible inferences before taking any action.

What is the impact, how has it changed the culture/ conversations/ work, etc.?
Growing a culture of data reflection and responsive teaching is a major challenge. Teachers are much more likely to see the benefit of talking about student data now that they have had several impactful experiences where they can see how useful data can be in planning instruction that meets the needs of their students.

What key decisions are being made with the use of data and the platform?
We consider programmatic decisions based on macro data and responsive instructional decisions based on individual student and class data.


One of our major challenges is deepening our capacity for responsive teaching--and that’s not usually based on data that goes into LAC portal, but rather is small formative checks that then teachers use to adjust their instruction. But experiencing the larger data meetings run by the teachers leaders and Office of Learning are one step that can help teachers build their capacity to apply this in smaller, more pervasive ways, so we plan to continue to build these systems and structures.

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Leading a School Culture that Values Data Informed Dialogue to Improve Student Learning

(This post is by Megan Brazil, Elementary School Principal, United Nations International School, Hanoi. The post was first published online in 2016.) In a ‘silo schools’ approach, teachers have generally been left to work independently on collecting, understanding and using their own classroom data to make decisions about instruction, planning and assessment. Many schools have not yet made the successful transition from individual to collaborative: to enable teams of teachers to collectively analyze  learning data in order to improve learning outcomes for all students. What we know to be true in many schools is that teachers still spend a disproportionate amount of time planning instruction, but don’t place the same emphasis or effort on finding out if the instruction really worked. Perhaps then, less importance has been placed on finding time for teams of teachers, coaches and administrators to take a look at the ‘back end’ — the learning that has taken place as a result of the planni

Designing Best-Fit Classes with the Class Placement Engine

(This post is by Ben Hacking , Deputy Principal at the Vienna International School ) Established in 1978, the Vienna International School (VIS) is a CIS accredited, IB World School situated in Vienna, Austria.   The School serves students from kindergarten to grade 12 who come mostly from the diplomatic corps and international businesses based in Vienna.   Diversity is one of VIS’s greatest strengths and the School is proud that of the 1368 students attending, approximately 112 nationalities are represented around 85 native languages are spoken altogether.   This diversity is also represented amongst our approximately 270 faculty members, leadership teams and administrative staff.   VIS joined the Learning Analytics Collaborative (LAC) in 2017-18 after an extensive internal review of, and reflection on, our own data for learning practices.  Over time, we have worked with the LAC to develop a number of engines to support and empower our faculty with the data tools and inquiry processes

LAC School Spotlight - American School of Bucharest

American School of Bucharest (by Andrew Pontius, IB MYP Coordinator, and Fiona Moss, Secondary Vice Principal at AISB) THE SCHOOL Number of students: Approx 950 Grades: EC2 - Grade 12 Number of faculty: 180+ Curriculum: IB (PYP, MYP, DP) Accredited by: NEASC, CIS, IB Joined LAC in the 2017-18 School Year  THE CHALLENGE What was the challenge the school was facing?   The original challenge was just visualizing data. We looked at IB DP Scores, but very little other data was consulted on a regular basis, and the few spreadsheets that were created were looked at only by the leadership teams. Why was LAC chosen?  Andrew had used LAC at his previous school (ISPP), and found that it had helped build some productive conversations in a multitude of ways. When shown to the then Director, the ideas of what else could be implemented grew, and we began working with LAC.  HOW IS THE LAC PLATFORM BEING USED NOW Who uses the platform at the school? Mainly used in Secondary by a range of people. It is