Skip to main content

From Mission to Metrics

Last week a new LAC school presented me with an interesting question: “How do we know we’re meeting our mission?”. It’s the kind of question that we often ask ourselves at accreditation season, but how many schools can truly answer with confidence and evidence?


The more I thought about it, the more I realised that unpacking this question is no different to any other data dive we might do. It requires us to understand what we’re measuring, to find a range of data to analyse, and then to use all that evidence to gain a deeper and more holistic understanding of our current situation and future goals.   





Step 1: Translating values into visible behaviours

What does our mission look like in action?


When we are living our mission, our values align with our actions. Let’s take “lifelong learning” as an example phrase we often see in mission statements. Schools that value lifelong learning will likely have administrators that promote and encourage staff professional development, teachers that participate fully in learning opportunities, and students who demonstrate independent learning outside of the classroom. 


Look at your mission, and break it down into the key areas: these are your values. For each value, what might the visible behaviour be? Consider all your stakeholders and all sections of your school. Ask teachers to to link each value to a classroom activity or observed behaviour. (lifelong learners do additional research outside of class time). The more we can identify the connections between our actions and our values, the better we can support students to develop these skills and live these values. 


Step 2: Gather the Evidence

For each of these actions or behaviours, what evidence might you collect? 


In the case of our lifelong learners, we might look at the annual PD budget, staff PD participation rates, and the grades awarded to students for completing independent projects like the Personal Project or CAS.  


Remember that data is not just the quantifiable metrics; equally important is the “street data”, or using the voices of the people involved to contextualise the information. A survey of teachers asking if they believe their professional development is valued, supported, and prioritised by school administration would bring useful context to show alongside participation numbers. Equally, interviewing parents to learn more about their children’s attitude to learning outside the classroom will bring some valuable insights. 


Step 3: Analyse the Data

What are your expectations, and how will you know if you’ve met them? 


For each data set, it is useful to identify benchmarks or success criteria. How much money needs to be allocated for a PD budget to be considered “healthy”? What percentage of teachers need to participate in external PD annually for it to be considered a “priority”? What does the average Personal Project score need to be for students to be considered “engaged”? It’s helpful to have an idea of your expectations before looking at what the data says. 


From there, to what extent have you met your expectations? And if not, why not? Examine the data, and consider why it has or hasn’t met your benchmarks. 

LAC provides custom designed board and operational dashboards that let you see at a glance multiple metrics, and the degree to which you’re meeting your internal standards for success. A mission dashboard could look at each value, each stakeholder, and combine data from multiple metrics to give you a comprehensive picture of your mission in action. 


Step 4: Identify questions and goals

What’s next? 


In practice, I have always found that this step almost goes without saying. When people look at data with a clear idea of why they are looking and what they expect to see, the questions naturally follow. “Why are parents saying that students are curious and engaged in their learning, but students are not participating actively in CAS?” “How can we say that professional learning is important to us, when we’ve only budgeted for one quarter of our teachers to attend conferences this year?” 

Each of these questions is an opportunity to learn more, to investigate deeply, and to set goals for the future. 


How well is your school meeting your mission? How do you know? And what’s the next step in your growth?  Let me know in the comments. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Social and Emotional Data to Promote a Positive School Culture

I came across this great article on Edutopia by Victoria Curry and Mike Setaro on how school leaders can combine traditional data with social and emotional data to get a full picture of the school experience of students and staff. It’s centered around Warm data that gives both dimension and measure to an individual’s and group’s social and emotional status. Opposite to Cool data points, that are a series of structural data sets such as enrollment, attendance, and academic proficiency that typically are the bedrock of school-based analytics. They talk about various examples of Warm data points among them on a matrix with different degrees of pleasantness and energy before engaging in learning (inspired by Mark Brackett’s work). These points can and should be captured, measured and visualized. The insights from this data should be of utmost importance for leaders to find strategies that capture and leverage information related to SEL and interpersonal skills. Harnessing this level of und...

Atlas Protocol - Looking at data

The Atlas Protocol is one of the most commonly used structured dialogue formats among schools to facilitate a conversation about data for teachers and other members of the faculty. Learning from Data is a tool to guide groups of teachers discovering what students, educators, and the public understands and how they are thinking. The tool, developed by Eric Buchovecky, is based in part on the work of the Leadership for Urban Mathematics Project and of the Assessment Communities of Teachers Project. The tool also draws on the work of Steve Seidel and Evangeline Harris-Stefanakis of Project Zero at Harvard University. The protocol gives a detailed step by step guide on how to prepare and conduct a healthy, productive conversation about and with use of data. It starts with a selection of datasets that do not lead to a single conclusion and generally lead to rich conversations. From that point forward, the protocol describes 6 stages the group has to follow with the help of a facilitator in...

What Data Can’t Do

I came across this fascinating article from the The New Yorker that really speaks volumes about how careful we have to be when it comes to using and visualizing data. Whenever you try to force the real world to do something that can be counted, unintended consequences abound. The COVID pandemic demonstrated just how vulnerable the world can be when you don’t have good statistics, and the US Presidential election filled our newspapers with polls and projections, all meant to slake our thirst for insight. The same applies to education where knowing what to measure, but also why you want to measure it, is the primary hurdle to tackle. We all have a tendency to naturally trust data as it aims to represent something we are observing. However there are times when simply even solid data is not enough for decision making. That’s why the context, the aim, and the balance between quantitative and qualitative data is so important. As the article states: “The great psychologist Daniel Kahneman, w...